
尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,药、护照、办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
版主: kazaawang, wh
-
- 论坛支柱
VladPutin 的博客 - 帖子互动: 1434
- 帖子: 12646
- 注册时间: 2022年 7月 24日 11:12
#1 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,药、护照、办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
+2.00 积分 [版主 wh 发放的奖励]
x1

上次由 wh 在 2025年 4月 21日 22:34 修改。
原因: 修改标题里的不实语言。
原因: 修改标题里的不实语言。

#3 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
当州长时年薪13万,包里常年有三千现金,呵呵。
观自在菩萨行深般若波罗蜜多时照见五蕴皆空度一切苦厄舍利子色不异空空不异色色即是空空即是色受想识亦复如是舍利子是诸法空相不生不灭不垢不淨不增不减是故空中无色无受想行识无眼耳鼻舌身意无色声香味触法无眼界乃至无意识界无无明亦无无明尽乃至无老死亦无老死尽无苦集灭道无智亦无得以无所得故菩提萨埵依般若波罗蜜多故心无罣碍无罣碍故无有恐怖远离颠倒梦想究竟涅槃三世诸佛依般若波罗蜜多故得阿耨多罗三藐三菩提故知般若波罗蜜多是大神咒是大明咒是无上咒是无等等咒能除一切苦真实不虚咒曰揭谛揭谛波罗揭谛波罗僧揭谛菩提萨婆诃
#4 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
与土鳖俱进,小偷反腐。
Tim Miller, of The Bulwark Podcast, on X: "Why does the DHS Secretary have 3 grand in cash on her person?"
Podcast host Brian Allen on X: "Yes, the woman in charge of protecting the nation... couldn't protect her purse."
"Angry Staffer" on X: "Noem's bag, including $3,000 in cash was stolen from a DC restaurant. What was her detail doing?"
"Anarchy princess" on X: "Personal or government checks???? What an epic failure. DHS badge?? My god."
Tim Miller, of The Bulwark Podcast, on X: "Why does the DHS Secretary have 3 grand in cash on her person?"
Podcast host Brian Allen on X: "Yes, the woman in charge of protecting the nation... couldn't protect her purse."
"Angry Staffer" on X: "Noem's bag, including $3,000 in cash was stolen from a DC restaurant. What was her detail doing?"
"Anarchy princess" on X: "Personal or government checks???? What an epic failure. DHS badge?? My god."
观自在菩萨行深般若波罗蜜多时照见五蕴皆空度一切苦厄舍利子色不异空空不异色色即是空空即是色受想识亦复如是舍利子是诸法空相不生不灭不垢不淨不增不减是故空中无色无受想行识无眼耳鼻舌身意无色声香味触法无眼界乃至无意识界无无明亦无无明尽乃至无老死亦无老死尽无苦集灭道无智亦无得以无所得故菩提萨埵依般若波罗蜜多故心无罣碍无罣碍故无有恐怖远离颠倒梦想究竟涅槃三世诸佛依般若波罗蜜多故得阿耨多罗三藐三菩提故知般若波罗蜜多是大神咒是大明咒是无上咒是无等等咒能除一切苦真实不虚咒曰揭谛揭谛波罗揭谛波罗僧揭谛菩提萨婆诃
-
- 论坛点评
juderiverman 的博客 - 帖子互动: 220
- 帖子: 3174
- 注册时间: 2022年 9月 28日 08:36
#6 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
https://www.thedailybeast.com/head-of-h ... ot-stolen/
Noem’s bag also contained medication, her passport, DHS access badge, a makeup bag, and blank checks, a law enforcement source told CNN.
Medication = 摇头丸?或许,可能,不是100%。
上次由 juderiverman 在 2025年 4月 21日 16:11 修改。
“We achieve inner peace when our schedule aligns with our values.”
#8 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
Was robbed? 不是说被偷的吗?
The Secret Service, which provides security for Noem, reviewed security camera footage at the Capital Burger restaurant and saw an unknown white male wearing a medical mask steal her bag and leave the restaurant, a law enforcement source said.
3000块是用来干这个的
she was using the withdrawal to treat her family to dinner, activities, and Easter gifts
话说回来,要是在中国,你能想象部长级的高官被偷吗?
这充分说明了美国的民主和自由,LOL
The Secret Service, which provides security for Noem, reviewed security camera footage at the Capital Burger restaurant and saw an unknown white male wearing a medical mask steal her bag and leave the restaurant, a law enforcement source said.
3000块是用来干这个的
she was using the withdrawal to treat her family to dinner, activities, and Easter gifts
话说回来,要是在中国,你能想象部长级的高官被偷吗?
这充分说明了美国的民主和自由,LOL
#9 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
写的是medication, 哪有说摇头丸了?不要随便造谣,太low
x1

-
- 论坛点评
juderiverman 的博客 - 帖子互动: 220
- 帖子: 3174
- 注册时间: 2022年 9月 28日 08:36
#11 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
Medication,什么都可能。$3000现金,不同寻常。
“We achieve inner peace when our schedule aligns with our values.”
#12 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
什么都有可能,那怎么不说是杀人的毒药呢?也可能是间谍常备的自杀毒药。这就没意思了
#13 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
那么多现金不是买毒品就是嫖娼吧,姐们需求大,一般男人满足不了?
也算跟川总并驾齐驱了
也算跟川总并驾齐驱了
x1

-
- 论坛支柱
VladPutin 的博客 - 帖子互动: 1434
- 帖子: 12646
- 注册时间: 2022年 7月 24日 11:12
#15 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
书只不过学习粉儿stretch事实, 比如不需要证据就能把合法居留的拉美人指控为恐怖分子黑帮。至少ice芭比的确是丢了drugs,也反常地随身携带护照,非常可疑。直钩钓气急败坏的粉儿果然有跳出来骂街的。LOL
x1


#17 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
53 索女,应该没了
Kristi Lynn Arnold Noem, the 8th United States secretary of homeland security, was born on November 30, 1971
Kristi Lynn Arnold Noem, the 8th United States secretary of homeland security, was born on November 30, 1971
#18 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
3000现金 难道要发红包 呵呵supercnm 写了: 2025年 4月 21日 16:21 Was robbed? 不是说被偷的吗?
The Secret Service, which provides security for Noem, reviewed security camera footage at the Capital Burger restaurant and saw an unknown white male wearing a medical mask steal her bag and leave the restaurant, a law enforcement source said.
3000块是用来干这个的
she was using the withdrawal to treat her family to dinner, activities, and Easter gifts
话说回来,要是在中国,你能想象部长级的高官被偷吗?
这充分说明了美国的民主和自由,LOL
估计毒贩和中餐馆老板才有这么多现金
#19 Re: 尴尬了,国土安全部的ICE Barbie部长在DC钱包被偷,常吃的摇头丸,用来逃跑的护照,办公室钥匙和证件全丢了
Carrying $3,000 in cash in the U.S. is unusual due to the prevalence of digital payments and the risks associated with carrying large sums. Here are some types of people who might do so, based on reasonable patterns:
Small Business Owners or Cash-Based Workers: People running cash-heavy businesses (e.g., food trucks, market vendors, or independent contractors like handymen) may carry large amounts for transactions or deposits. For example, a restaurant owner might have cash from a busy weekend.
Individuals in Cash-Centric Communities: Some cultural or immigrant communities prefer cash for daily transactions, like in certain ethnic enclaves where businesses favor cash payments. They might carry significant amounts for convenience or distrust of banks.
Wealthy Individuals or High Spenders: Affluent people might carry large sums for spontaneous purchases (e.g., luxury goods, auctions, or tipping generously). Though less common, some prefer cash for privacy or status.
People Avoiding Digital Transactions: Those distrustful of banks, concerned about privacy, or evading financial tracking (e.g., tax evaders or individuals with legal concerns) might carry cash. This could include "preppers" or those skeptical of digital systems.
Travelers or One-Time Situations: Someone preparing for a trip, a major cash-only purchase (e.g., a used car from a private seller), or an event (e.g., a wedding vendor payment) might temporarily carry $3,000.
Criminals or Illicit Actors: While not typical, those involved in illegal activities (e.g., drug trafficking or money laundering) often use cash to avoid traceable transactions. This is a small but notable group.
Context and Risks:
Carrying $3,000 isn’t illegal, but it’s risky due to theft, loss, or civil asset forfeiture (where police can seize large cash amounts if they suspect wrongdoing, even without charges).
Most Americans carry far less—surveys suggest the average is $50-$100 in cash.
Businesses report cash payments are declining, with only 16% of U.S. transactions in 2023 being cash-based (per Federal Reserve data).
Demographics: No single "type" dominates, but it could include older individuals (less tech-savvy), rural residents (fewer digital payment options), or urban dwellers in cash-heavy economies. Men are slightly more likely than women to carry larger sums, per consumer studies.
If you have a specific context (e.g., urban vs. rural, age group), I can refine this further.
Small Business Owners or Cash-Based Workers: People running cash-heavy businesses (e.g., food trucks, market vendors, or independent contractors like handymen) may carry large amounts for transactions or deposits. For example, a restaurant owner might have cash from a busy weekend.
Individuals in Cash-Centric Communities: Some cultural or immigrant communities prefer cash for daily transactions, like in certain ethnic enclaves where businesses favor cash payments. They might carry significant amounts for convenience or distrust of banks.
Wealthy Individuals or High Spenders: Affluent people might carry large sums for spontaneous purchases (e.g., luxury goods, auctions, or tipping generously). Though less common, some prefer cash for privacy or status.
People Avoiding Digital Transactions: Those distrustful of banks, concerned about privacy, or evading financial tracking (e.g., tax evaders or individuals with legal concerns) might carry cash. This could include "preppers" or those skeptical of digital systems.
Travelers or One-Time Situations: Someone preparing for a trip, a major cash-only purchase (e.g., a used car from a private seller), or an event (e.g., a wedding vendor payment) might temporarily carry $3,000.
Criminals or Illicit Actors: While not typical, those involved in illegal activities (e.g., drug trafficking or money laundering) often use cash to avoid traceable transactions. This is a small but notable group.
Context and Risks:
Carrying $3,000 isn’t illegal, but it’s risky due to theft, loss, or civil asset forfeiture (where police can seize large cash amounts if they suspect wrongdoing, even without charges).
Most Americans carry far less—surveys suggest the average is $50-$100 in cash.
Businesses report cash payments are declining, with only 16% of U.S. transactions in 2023 being cash-based (per Federal Reserve data).
Demographics: No single "type" dominates, but it could include older individuals (less tech-savvy), rural residents (fewer digital payment options), or urban dwellers in cash-heavy economies. Men are slightly more likely than women to carry larger sums, per consumer studies.
If you have a specific context (e.g., urban vs. rural, age group), I can refine this further.
-
- 论坛支柱
CanGuanGong 的博客 - 帖子互动: 390
- 帖子: 8867
- 注册时间: 2022年 7月 23日 18:05